Welcome to FluoridationFacts.com, incorporating the Australian Fluoridation News Archive and HREX fluoride-related files.

Please note: This website is mostly inactive. The nature of this website will also change to an archive-cum-database for out-of-print magazine articles, dental health data and related publications, and scientific literature. The Australian Fluoridation News has also moved to another server based in Australia. However, the 'AFN' will be backed-up on this website on a regular basis. The Webmaster, 7th August, 2005.

About Us

Contact Us

Useful Links

Translation

Site Map

Infodocs

Opinion Polls

Pictures

Propaganda

Unethical Con.

News Centre

Press Release

Political

Register

Dental Data

Forums/Reviews

Papers

Statements

Aus F News

Copy List

HREX

UPDATED

02 MAR 06

Ad-Rate:4
Homepage
News Centre
Press Releases
001 6th Oct 2000
002 6th Oct 2000
003 11th Oct 2000
004 25th Oct 2000
005 17th Nov 2000
006 3rd Dec 2000
007 26th Jan 2001
008 26th Apr 2001
009 21st Aug 2001
010 20th Jul 2002
011 25th Jul 2002
012 1st Aug 2002
013 Deleted
014 12th May 2003
015 29th Sep 2003
016 30th Nov 2003

Press Release 004

#004

Press Release #004  Date: 25th October 2000

for immediate release

Headline: Department of Health 'chicken out' on fluoride consumption level monitoring.

World Health Organisation advice being ignored by Government.

DoH terrified of consequences of poisoning claims and litigation.

STORY

On the 23rd October, Joanne Walley, Labour MP, Stoke-On-Trent North, asked the Secretary of State for Health to set out the WHO requirements for monitoring fluoride levels.

In the reply, published today on the Parliament Internet web-site, Yvette Cooper (for the DoH) replied that the WHO recommendation on monitoring fluoride levels was 'advisory' rather than mandatory.

Successive Governments have repeatedly refused to introduce measures to measure fluoride consumption by populations to determine total fluoride intake from all sources. This is in direct conflict with the simple scientific principle of knowing exactly how much fluoride is being consumed by individuals before exposing them to the *polluted fluorides which are dumped into public water supplies (*the phosphate fertilizer industry's toxic waste which contains arsenic, mercury, cyanide, etc.).

For too long the Government has relied on bad or contrived evidence to support their campaign to fluoridate water. The blatant refusal to monitor fluoride levels is just another example of how they are running scared of potential litigation claims as well as having their 'science' exposed as pure quackery.

Until the Government begins to take a common sense, no nonsense approach to fluoride consumption, it will continue to be accused of scientific fraud - an allegation also aimed at the Government's recent 'scientific review' and made by the Parents with Fluoride Poisoned Children organisation (http://www.bruha.com/fluoride/index.htm).

Below, Joanne Walley's written question and answer;-
__________________________

Fluoride

23 Oct 2000 : Column: 91W

Ms Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will set out WHO requirements in respect of (a) monitoring of fluoride levels, and (b) children in receipt of fluoridated milk. [R] [134146]

Yvette Cooper: Reports from the World Health Organisation (WHO) contain valuable information, which can helpfully inform government policy but, unless they are incorporated into United Kingdom law, their status is advisory rather than mandatory. Technical guidance on methods of measurement of fluoride, and their interpretation, and on fluoridation of mild (sic), is included in recent WHO publications such as Technical Report 846 "Fluorides and oral health" (1994) and "Monitoring of renal fluoride excretion in community preventive programmes on oral health" (1999).
__________________________

END OF STATEMENT


TRANSLATION | EDUCATION | NEWS | POLITICAL | SCIENCE | AFN | HREX | ABOUT [fluoride.org.uk] | CONTACT | LINKS | SITE MAP