Files

Press Release Index

PR 001

PR 002

PR 003

PR 004

PR 005

PR 006

PR 007

PR 008

PR 009

PR 010

PR 011

PR 012

PR 013 n/a

PR 014

PR 015

PR 016

Press Release 012

1st August, 2002. For immediate release

Headline: Time for the media to support Belgian Bravery and abandon the sanitised science of Big Brother

Just a few days ago, an explosive statement on the safety of fluoride was made by the Belgian Health Minister, Magda Aelvoet.

The initial response of the media was to report the facts as they appeared. But the greatest danger to the truth is yet to come from the media.

Despite some claims of unbiased reporting on the issue of the safety of fluoride, it is often noted by this source that when referring to dangers from fluoride, the warnings are usually referred to as "claims" rather than established science or proven facts.

Conversely, and in typically true Big Brother fashion, the establishment in general is often given the benefit of the doubt inasmuch that their 'claims' are usually portrayed as established science or proven facts.

The author has 11 years of experience of the study of fluoride and fluoridation. And it's not just the science, but also the politics, the corruption and the trickery of the pro-fluoride lobby has been exposed on this website.

For example, (now) fluoride.website has exposed, or showed:

• That teeth damaged (pitted, stained, etc) by fluoride are counted as SOUND in UK dental health surveys.
• That the UK Governments own sponsored review of fluoridation deliberately omitted important evidence on the dangers of fluorides, as well as manipulating certain findings and results. The severity of dental fluorosis is just one example.
• That improvements in dental health in fluoridated districts are due mainly to factors not related to fluoridated water. Furthermore, large improvements in dental health have been demonstrated on numerous occasions in NON-fluoridated districts.
• That the science of fluoride is subject to intimidation. Whistleblowers who have exposed the links between fluoride and cancer, brain damage, etc., have been blatantly victimised for speaking out.
• That the vote to fluoridated UK's water supplies in 1985 was RIGGED. The Government Bill was supposed to be a 'free vote' but a two-line whip was used to intimidate anti-fluoridation pay-roll MPs.
• That pro-fluoride campaigners who make misleading claims about fluoride often run shy of open debates with qualified scientists. As Professor Paul Connett has frequently stated: "They [the supporters of water fluoridation] argue like parrots and defend like chickens."

IT IS TIME FOR THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA TO BEGIN TO REPORT THE CREDIBLE FACTS BEHIND THE 'FLUORIDE CONSPIRACY' AND TO EXPOSE THE DECEIT AND TRICKERY OF THE PRO-FLUORIDE LOBBY.

UNTIL THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DOES ACT AND REPORT MORE RESPONSIBLY, IT WILL REMAIN A 'PATSY' [OR POODLE] FOR THE UNSCIENTIFIC, UNPROVEN, CORRUPT, MISLEADING, FRAUDULENT AND DISTORTED VIEWS OF THE BIG BROTHER ESTABLISHMENT.

END OF STATEMENT.

ITEM HERE